|
| Common names: Mugger, muggar, marsh
crocodile
Range: Bangladesh, Iran, India, Nepal,
Pakistan, Sri Lanka |
|
Conservation overview
CITES: Appendix I
CSG Action Plan:
Availability of Survey Data – Poor
Need for Wild Population Recovery – High
Potential for Sustainable Management – Moderate
1996 IUCN Red List: VU Vulnerable – Criteria: A.1.a.
decline of 20% in 3 generations in extent of occurrence.
C.2.a. Wild population less than 2,500 adults and
habitat fragmented and declining.
Principal threats: Habitat destruction.
Ecology and natural history
The mugger is a medium-sized crocodile (maximum length
ca. 4–5m), and has the broadest snout of any living member
of the genus Crocodylus. Muggers are principally restricted
to the Indian subcontinent where they may be found in a
number of freshwater habitat types including rivers, lakes
and marshes. In India and Sri Lanka, mugger crocodiles
have adapted well to reservoirs, irrigation canals and man
made ponds, and in some areas may even be found in
coastal saltwater lagoons (Whitaker 1987, Whitaker and
Whitaker 1989). In some areas of northern India and
Nepal, mugger populations are sympatric with gharial,
but the two species tend to be segregated by habitat.
Where found together with gharial, muggers tend to bask
in midstream on rocks or muddy banks (Groombridge
1982). This species, like a number of other crocodilians, is
known to dig burrows.
Mugger crocodiles are a hole nesting species. As with
other hole nesters, egg laying takes place during the annual
dry season. Females become sexually mature at a length of
approximately 1.8–2m, and lay 25–30 eggs (Whitaker and
Whitaker 1989). Nests are located in a wide variety of
habitats, and females have even been known to nest at the
opening of, or inside, the burrow (B.C. Choudhury, pers.
comm.). In captivity, some mugger crocodiles are known
to lay two clutches in a single year (Whitaker and Whitaker
1984), but this has not been observed in the wild. Incubation
is relatively short, typically lasting 55–75 days (Whitaker
1987). Whitaker and Whitaker (1989) provide a good
review of the behavior and ecology of this species.
Conservation and status
While illegal skin trade was a major problem in the past
(1950s–1960s), the current threats to the mugger crocodile
are principally habitat destruction, drowning in fish nets,
egg predation by people, and the use of crocodile parts for
medicinal purposes (Groombridge 1982). Adequate survey
data exist only for India and Sri Lanka, and indicate that
populations, while generally small and isolated, are
widespread. Sri Lanka has the largest remaining wild
populations (approx. 2,000 individuals), but they are
concentrated in only two National Parks, Wilpattu and
Yala (Whitaker and Whitaker 1979). In other areas, muggers
are being threatened by rapid agricultural and industrial
development (Whitaker and Whitaker 1989). In India,
muggers are reported from over 50 locations and the wild
population is tentatively estimated at 3,000–5,000 (Anon.
1993b). In Pakistan, the mugger is reported to be extinct in
the Punjab province due to alteration of habitat (Chaudhury
1993). Small populations are reported in Sind along the
Nara Canal, in Khairpur Sanghar and Nawab districts and
Haleji lake. These are said to be vulnerable and diminishing.
The mugger remains widely distributed in Baluchistan with
confirmed locations on the Nari, Hab, Titiani, Hingol and
Dasht rivers and Nahang and Kach Kuar. In all cases the
populations are of unknown but small size. Approximately
50 individuals are held in captivity in seven facilities and
three pairs are breeding. A program is ongoing to obtain
mugger from the captive bred stock in India for release into
protected habitats. A survey in Nepal was initiated in 1993
(McEachern 1994). Preliminary results indicate that the
mugger is now restricted to isolated populations, primarily
in protected habitats. Small numbers of individuals are
known or suspected from the Mahakali, Nala, Karnali,
Babai, Rapti, Narayani and Koshi river systems. Alienation
of habitat by river disruption and damming, and mortality
in fisheries are major problems. A recent investigation in
Bangladesh (Cox and Rahman 1994) reports the mugger to
be extinct in the wild and only six wild derived specimens
are kept in captivity. In Iran, muggers are known from the
drainages of the Sarbaz (=Dashtiari) and Kajou (=Koja)
rivers. Preliminary counts of the main habitat in 1992
revealed at least 118 individuals (Gholi Kami 1994, Gholi
Kami and Saghari 1993). Van Dink (1993), reports that the
last record of muggers in Myanmar was 1867–68 and that
the species is probably extinct there.
Management of mugger crocodiles is based principally
on the legal protection of wild populations and captive
breeding for restocking. In India, a large-scale captive
rearing program was initiated in 1975. The project has
collected eggs from the wild, as well as produced young
from captive adult breeding stock. The resulting juveniles
have been used to restock natural populations in 28 national
parks, wildlife reserves and crocodile sanctuaries throughout
the country. A total of 1,193 individuals were released
between 1978 and 1992. Unfortunately, there has been little
improvement in persuading people to live with crocodiles
and there is little additional habitat where more muggers
can be introduced. Currently there are over 12,000 muggers
in captivity. Facing a crisis of overcrowding, the Indian
government instructed breeding centers to cease producing
new offspring in 1994 and the program is currently at a
standstill.
The Indian government has adopted a policy prohibiting
any evaluation of commercial use of captive bred crocodiles
for conservation. The future of the mugger in India is
therefore uncertain.
Priority projects
High priority
Determination of the status of restocked muggers in India:
No single agency is responsible for tracking the success of
restocking activities. The current crisis of overstocking in
captive breeding centers and uncertainty on the success of
restocking remains an impediment to developing a coherent
new strategy to meet current needs. Ongoing studies on
survival, growth and population size at restocked locations
are needed.
Establishment of a conservation / management program in
Pakistan: Recent reports suggest that mugger crocodile
populations in Pakistan remain viable after being severely
depleted by commercial hunting. However, no formal
surveys have been conducted, and in some parts of the
country continued killing has been reported. Interest has
been expressed in initiating a restocking program similar
to the one in India. However, surveys of population status
and a biological research program are a prerequisite to
establishing a management program.
Conservation and management in Sri Lanka: Since the
surveys by Whitaker and Whitaker (1979) no work has
been done in Sri Lanka, which at that time had the best
remaining wild mugger populations. New surveys are
required to reassess the current status of the species, and
are needed as a prerequisite to developing a conservation
program.
Moderate priority
Expansion of restocking program in India: Restocking
efforts have declined in recent years, in part due to a lack
of suitable release sites. This has been attributed to the
lack of field investigations and positive public-relations
programs (Whitaker and Whitaker 1989). In some areas
local opposition to crocodile releases has blocked
restocking proposals. New areas appropriate for
crocodile releases need to be identified and included in
the crocodile reserve system. Appropriate public
relations efforts also need to be undertaken to ameliorate
local opposition based on misinformation concerning
crocodiles.
Potential for sustainable management in India: The surplus
of captive animals and recent human-crocodile conflicts
have made the sustainable utilization (ranching or farming)
of this species a potential alternative management strategy.
The feasibility of limited commercial utilization needs to
be examined as a means to invigorate the Indian crocodile
conservation program.

Captive-bred muggers, Crocodylus palustris,
at Madras Crocodile Bank, India. Shortage of
locations for wild release is causing crowding
in captive rearing facilities. Photo by H. Andrews.
[Top of this Page] -
[References] -
[Next Page] -
[Table of Contents]
|